Man, I'm all over all of this.. I represent just about 100%.. I have numerous PC's, running MS-based OS's and Fedora Linux, I have Wii, 360, and now PS3, as well as just about every console system from the Atari 2600 to current day (Atari 2600x2, Atari 5600, NES, SuperNES, N64, Gamecubex2(one modded), Genesis, SegaCD, Saturn, Dreamcast, Xbox x4 (2modded), Psx (old gray), PSOne(small, white), PS2 x3 (one modded), no slim PS2..)..
PC I prefer, not that is becoming a more rare thing. I do like the customization possible with PC versions of titles, and of course, running servers, tweaking, etc.. It's a bummer when the game exceeds your PC however, and that double-edged sword sometimes gives you an unfair advantage OR disadvantage over fellow PC players. It also used to be the case that PC titles were slightly cheaper than nextgen console games, which were totally exploiting "we run in HD now, it costs more to develop" bigtime when they started charging $59.99 per title. Prior to this, there were many games in my collection here that I owned over multiple platforms.
Here's a little secret though.. First off, for 360 (and others) there are adapters for usb/PS2(the keyboard, not the console!) keyboard/mouse adapters so you can enjoy the key/mouse combo in FPS shooters, even though 'they' don't want you to. Console games almost always have a sensitivity option which is cranked way down for some reason; alter the setting to a more 'PC friendly' feel for greater enjoyment. What I DO like about console systems is that in many cases, they offer co-op/split-screen play, meaning if my son and I want to play Black Ops, I don't have to fork over $100-120 bucks for 2 PC copies, one $59 360/PS3 disc will do it.
There are many good console-only titles out there, that you are just plain missing if you avoid consoles. And, since they are designed around a very specific set of hardware (not identical, because console version do have slight changes), you can rest assured when you buy it, it WILL play great, if not superbly. None of this PC Paid Betaware that plagues just about EVERY recent title in the last few years.
360 has Kinect, PS3 has MOVE and the six-axis (ps3 controllers are also motion capable), Wii has, well it's already built in to their controllers
. There already is software to use Kinect on the PC, though it's not official yet from MS (it will be, just as any 360 perhiperal, from controllers to steering wheels, to... is). The Kinect is designed by Jonny Chung Lee, if I got his name right - He was the guy who made the Wiimote's world-wide popular for hooking them up to a PC, using them as a gigantic white-board, even released a somewhat cool 3d target shooter using the wiimote and 'fingergloves' (a glove with reflective strips on your fingers).. I posted his stuff on year years ago, so yeah, there's no doubt he'll release similar for the PC..
I use an antenna, no cable/satellite. We watch the local news in the morning/evening on it, that's about it. The HD quality is awesome, far better than cable, who gets their HD feed, and like sat. co's, compresses it.. It's amazing the raw, true 1080p signal that is broadcast live, for free. But, because of our schedules and life in general, most our show watching is done later. I download the shows to meh media PC, then use either our HTPC (Home theater PC), one of the 360's, the XBox(modded running XBMC) or the PS3 to watch them. This also allows pretty much any device in my house to watch the shows, regardless of time/location. As long as there is a console/PC, and a viewing device (HDTV and old CRT or puter monitor) you are set. Oh, and the Android phones in my house and PSP can also tune into said library. There is also an HDHomeRun hooked to my network which allows various programs including but not limited to Media Center access the TV feed on the HDHR's dual-tuner, to play and or record shows myself. It grabs what I don't normally snag off the net. I've also been working on converting all my DVD's (don't even ask how many) to .avi for playback anywhere as well.
I guess what I'm saying is that PC and consoles are just an integrated part of our lives here. We use them for far more than just games.. In fact, numerous PC's run the Folding@Home 24/7, and now, my PS3 does as well. So when they aren't entertaining us, they are working to potentially save YOUR life, or someone you know
FWIW, I am in the 15k ranking overall of well over 1.5milliion users.
I do somewhat disagree on the development comment on Linux. Distro's are incredibly advanced. The problem with linux in general is that it's key feature, the ability to be unique is exactly what kills it. Unlike console systems, and unlike your favorite PC OS, be it MS-based or Apple (oh, I do own an Apple G3 Blue&White, which also folds when it's not being used, which isn't often), it's near impossible for any developer to code "that great game" or application for linux because it would take a lifetime to ensure it would run on any more than the top 3 flavors. That, is Linux's gift and curse. Non intense programs, like OpenOffice, for instance, absolutely rock. And for a couple my PC's here, including a HTPC, linux is a super-stable, absolutely free rocking way to be. And there are several cool "linux-based" games that run well, as well.. But getting all that back-end stuff united so that gamer development companies would code for linux would mean less freedom to be what linux is. Like I say, it's a double-edged sword, unfortunately.
Apple, which I despise, is onto one great thing. As is partially true with MS-OS's, Apple's OSX IS a linux OS. Apple controls very tightly the hardware. Therefore, like a console, Apple systems "appear" to be smoother, better designed, because Apple is controlling your experience. Think about it. If MS said you have to buy brand x or y mobo, brand f or k's CPU, etc.. If they laid out a specific set of hardware requirements by brand and model, how much more stable your MS PC would be. Thankfully, they don't. But, the cost is that your PC just might lock up or bug out a little more than your Apple buddy.
No matter how you dice it up, good times can be had on both, just have to be open-minded and try out some titles. If you, an avid PC gamer pick up Halo:Reach for 360, you won't like it out the gate, even if you ARE familiar with consoles.. Tweak the settings, and I can almost promise you'll see whey millions, if not 10's or 100's of millions of purchases say: Halo is awesome. Great story-line, great gameplay. Just gotta get past (or buy an adapter!) the controller vs. key/mouse dilemma. I like both, in fact, on my PC sits a 360 controller. Back in my BF2 days, I used to use a self-hacked original Xbox controller. I roamed on foot and land vehicles with key/mouse, but jets and heli's, I was all about the xbox controller. I had wicked flight skillz
I miss those days...